Amartya Sen explores the role of argument in a wide range of spheres in Indian life.
Respectful dialogue is a more effective way of dealing with differences than simply demonising or denouncing an opponent. He praises the idea of secularism but he contrasts the Indian view of secularism (which also exists elsewhere) which involves treating other religions with respect with the view which seeks to suppress religion. He cites the French ban on religious dress for muslim girls as an example but the world is full of them.
The author is no Socialist but it is very telling for a Socialist to read his view that the inequalities of religion, gender, sexuality and caste are all exacerbated by the inequalities of class. He cites inter alia the fact that India has had a female head of state whereas France, Japan and the USA have never done so. The position of the affluent women is fundamentally different from the position of working-class women. I first heard this line of argument from the UK Socialist Party's Peter Taaffe in 1969.
He points to India's continued status as a united country and a democracy in which power goes from one party to another without violence as two examples of the power of argument.
It is a thought-provoking work. It is also easy to read and enjoy.
No comments:
Post a Comment